Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42699498›Full record

ArticleEJIFCC2026

Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Prediction Using Machine Learning: A Comparative Analysis of Classification Algorithms.

Usha Adiga, Vasishta Sampara, Pedda Reddemma P, Supriya P, Sireesha Kanchi, Kasala Farzia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJIFCC, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Usha AdigaDepartment of Biochemistry, Apollo Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Chittoor, Andhra Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7832-3991
Vasishta SamparaDepartment of Biochemistry, Apollo Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Chittoor, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Pedda Reddemma PDepartment of Biochemistry, Apollo Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Chittoor, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Supriya PDepartment of Biochemistry, Apollo Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Chittoor, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Sireesha KanchiResearch Assistant, ICMR, Dept of Biochemistry, Apollo Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Chittoor, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Kasala FarziaDepartment of Biochemistry, Apollo Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Chittoor, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) represents one of the most prevalent endocrine disorders affecting women of reproductive age, with significant implications for metabolic, reproductive, and psychological health. Early and accurate diagnosis remains challenging due to heterogeneous clinical presentations and the complexity of diagnostic criteria. Objective: This study aimed to develop and compare multiple machine learning algorithms for predicting PCOS diagnosis, evaluating their performance across various metrics to identify the most effective computational approach for clinical decision support. Methods: A comprehensive dataset containing clinical, biochemical, and anthropometric parameters from patients was analyzed using twelve different machine learning algorithms. The dataset underwent rigorous preprocessing including missing value imputation, feature engineering, and categorical encoding. Models evaluated included Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, K-Nearest Neighbors, Naive Bayes, Decision Tree, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, XGBoost, AdaBoost, Neural Network, LightGBM, and HistGradientBoosting. Performance was assessed using accuracy, F1-score, sensitivity, specificity, and ROC-AUC scores. Results: Gradient Boosting, XGBoost, and HistGradientBoosting demonstrated superior performance with accuracy of 92.66%, while ensemble methods generally outperformed single classifiers. Gradient Boosting achieved the highest F1-score of 87.87% and ROC-AUC of 95.39%. Random Forest exhibited exceptional specificity at 98.63%, while Naive Bayes showed the highest sensitivity of 94.44%. Traditional machine learning approaches like SVM and Neural Networks showed comparatively limited performance in this context. Conclusion: Machine learning algorithms, particularly gradient boosting methods, demonstrate substantial potential for accurate PCOS prediction and can serve as valuable tools for clinical decision support, potentially enabling earlier intervention and improved patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Clinical decision supportGradient boostingMachine learningPolycystic ovary syndromePredictive modeling

Identifiers

PMID42699498
PMCPMC13543484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.