Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42699464›Full record

ArticleJamba (Potchefstroom, South Africa)2026

Optimising local institutional role for sustainable community preparedness in Krinjing: The slope of Merapi Volcano.

Dewi L Setyowati, Syamsul Bachri, Andi I Benardi, Bayu Wijayanto, Sriyono Sriyono, Atta-Ur Rahman, Fajar Wulandari, Jaka P Rahmajati

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Jamba (Potchefstroom, South Africa), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dewi L SetyowatiDepartment of Geography, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6191-6026
Syamsul BachriDepartment of Geography, Faculty of Social Science, Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4576-5616
Andi I BenardiDepartment of Geography, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8818-4104
Bayu WijayantoDepartment of Geography, Faculty of Social Science, Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9279-6592
Sriyono SriyonoDepartment of Geography, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3460-1509
Atta-Ur RahmanDepartment of Geography and Geomatics, University of Peshawar, Peshawar, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5932-2288
Fajar WulandariDepartment of Geography, Faculty of Social Science, Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4282-0157
Jaka P RahmajatiDepartment of Geography, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8322-2935

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effectiveness of local institutions in disaster-prone areas is often assessed with a bias towards administrative aspects or social solidarity alone, without in-depth operational evaluation. This study audits the internal performance of the Disaster Risk Reduction Organisation or Organisasi Pengurangan Risiko Bencana (OPRB) in Krinjing Village, Magelang, facing the threat of Merapi Volcano's eruption. Using a quantitative descriptive approach with purposive sampling, data were collected through a closed-ended questionnaire administered to 12 key structural informants, followed by in-depth interviews to contextualise the findings. The results showed a significant difference: the OPRB demonstrated superior tactical capacity in the emergency response phase, driven by social capital and logistical independence. However, this advantage is inversely proportional to the pre-disaster phase, marked by top-down planning and minimal participation. In the post-disaster phase, the OPRB showed the lowest performance in monitoring and evaluation, breaking the organisational learning cycle. These findings indicate that the OPRB does not currently function as an adaptive resilience organisation. To transform this capacity, the study formulates three institutional engineering strategies: institutionalising disaster management in the RPJMDes document, formalising local wisdom and decentralising authority. These approaches are expected to close the managerial gap and achieve sustainable community resilience on Merapi's slopes. Contribution: This research fills a practical and theoretical gap by demonstrating how the dominance of top-down approaches in local disaster management stifles grassroots resilience, despite strong informal social capital during emergencies. Its primary contribution is a phase-specific evaluation and a strategic transformation model to institutionalise resilience, directly supporting the journal's scope of disaster risk reduction and resilience.

Indexed as

community resiliencedisaster managementdisaster risk reductioninstitutional performanceMerapi Volcanosustainable community

Identifiers

PMID42699464
PMCPMC13543248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.