ArticleJamba (Potchefstroom, South Africa)2026
Optimising local institutional role for sustainable community preparedness in Krinjing: The slope of Merapi Volcano.
Article in Jamba (Potchefstroom, South Africa), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The effectiveness of local institutions in disaster-prone areas is often assessed with a bias towards administrative aspects or social solidarity alone, without in-depth operational evaluation. This study audits the internal performance of the Disaster Risk Reduction Organisation or Organisasi Pengurangan Risiko Bencana (OPRB) in Krinjing Village, Magelang, facing the threat of Merapi Volcano's eruption. Using a quantitative descriptive approach with purposive sampling, data were collected through a closed-ended questionnaire administered to 12 key structural informants, followed by in-depth interviews to contextualise the findings. The results showed a significant difference: the OPRB demonstrated superior tactical capacity in the emergency response phase, driven by social capital and logistical independence. However, this advantage is inversely proportional to the pre-disaster phase, marked by top-down planning and minimal participation. In the post-disaster phase, the OPRB showed the lowest performance in monitoring and evaluation, breaking the organisational learning cycle. These findings indicate that the OPRB does not currently function as an adaptive resilience organisation. To transform this capacity, the study formulates three institutional engineering strategies: institutionalising disaster management in the RPJMDes document, formalising local wisdom and decentralising authority. These approaches are expected to close the managerial gap and achieve sustainable community resilience on Merapi's slopes. Contribution: This research fills a practical and theoretical gap by demonstrating how the dominance of top-down approaches in local disaster management stifles grassroots resilience, despite strong informal social capital during emergencies. Its primary contribution is a phase-specific evaluation and a strategic transformation model to institutionalise resilience, directly supporting the journal's scope of disaster risk reduction and resilience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.