ArticleJournal of the colleges of medicine of South Africa2026
Exploring faculty and student perceptions of online surgical teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study.
Article in Journal of the colleges of medicine of South Africa, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic necessitated a rapid transition from contact-based to online surgical teaching for final-year undergraduate medical students. While online teaching offers benefits such as flexibility and accessibility, it raises concerns about the loss of clinical exposure, which is integral to surgical training. This study explored faculty (teaching staff) and student perceptions of an online surgical teaching and learning module implemented during the pandemic, examining perceived effectiveness and identifying challenges and areas for improvement. Methods: A qualitative descriptive study was conducted using purposive sampling. Nine virtual synchronous focus group discussions were conducted via Zoom, one with teaching staff and eight with students. Focus group discussions were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim, and the data were later analysed using thematic content analysis. Results: Five themes were derived from the data: (1) perceptions of online teaching and learning effectiveness; (2) a lack of clinical exposure and preparedness for internship; (3) module structure and self-organisation; (4) information technology-related challenges; and (5) the way forward post-COVID-19. Both groups valued the module's organisation, resource accessibility, content standardisation and alignment of outcomes, teaching and assessment. Negative aspects included limited clinical and procedural exposure and challenges with student engagement in live Zoom sessions. Conclusion: Online learning proved a feasible alternative during the COVID-19 pandemic, with numerous benefits; however, both faculty and students agreed that blended modes of instruction should be explored going forward. Contribution: This study contributes to the development of practices for integrating online teaching methods into General Surgery education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.