Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42699389›Full record

ArticleAmerican heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice2026

Sex differences in single and combined cardiovascular medication use.

T C X Duk, A Uijl, P A J Kiss, E Smits, D E Grobbee, S A E Peters

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

T C X DukJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Global Public Health and Bioethics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
A UijlJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Global Public Health and Bioethics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
P A J KissJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Global Public Health and Bioethics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
E SmitsPHARMO Institute for Drug Outcomes Research, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
D E GrobbeeJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Global Public Health and Bioethics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
S A E PetersJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Global Public Health and Bioethics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Drug therapy is a key component in the prevention and management of cardiovascular disease (CVD). In this study, we assess sex differences in the use of single and combined cardiovascular medication. Methods: We analyzed data from individuals ≥40 years old between 2010 and 2020 in the PHARMO Data Network, which included data from out-patient pharmacies and primary care across the Netherlands. Included individuals were either at high-risk for CVD or were previously diagnosed with CVD. Dispensed cardiovascular medications were categorized into ten medication classes, based on their active substances. Concomitant medication was defined as medication dispensed in the same semester. Sex-specific dispense patterns and women-to-men prevalence ratios (PRs) were calculated for groups stratified by age and CVD status. Results: In total, 53,110 individuals at high-risk for CVD (36% women) and 71,996 individuals diagnosed with CVD (45% women) were included. Fifty out of 645 drug combinations had a median prevalence of ≥1%. Combinations of five or more drugs were more frequent in men compared to women, regardless of age and CVD status (range prevalence difference between sexes: 2-5%). Specifically, three combinations of five or more drugs were more often dispensed to men than women (PR range: 0.5-0.7). Conclusion: This study highlights sex differences in the number and types of dispensed combined cardiovascular medication, with dispenses of five or more cardiovascular drugs being more common in men than women. Age, sex, and CVD status contributed to differences in specific dispensed combinations.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular diseaseCardiovascular drugsDrug combinationsDrug utilizationPolypharmacySex differences

Identifiers

PMID42699389
PMCPMC13543110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.