Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42699359›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology open science2026

Oncologic Outcomes in a Contemporary "PROTEUS-like" Cohort of High-risk Prostate Cancer Treated with Radical Prostatectomy Without Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy.

Can Aydogdu, Benso John, Clara Seizer, Frederik Kolligs, Iason Papadopoulos, Alexander Buchner, Elena K Berg, Jozefina Casuscelli, Julie Steinestel, Roman Mayr and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology open science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03767244 (A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 3 Study of Apalutamide in Subjects With High-risk, Localized or Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer Who Are Candidates for Radical Prostatectomy), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03767244 phase3active not recruitingnot on this map

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 3 Study of Apalutamide in Subjects With High-risk, Localized or Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer Who Are Candidates for Radical Prostatectomy

TypeinterventionalSponsorJanssen Research & Development, LLCRan2019 to 2028Enrolled2,517ConditionsProstatic NeoplasmsArmsApalutamide, Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT), Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Can AydogduDepartment of Urology, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.
Benso JohnDepartment of Urology, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.
Clara SeizerDepartment of Urology, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.
Frederik KolligsDepartment of Urology, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.
Iason PapadopoulosDepartment of Urology, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.
Alexander BuchnerDepartment of Urology, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.
Elena K BergDepartment of Urology, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jozefina CasuscelliDepartment of Urology, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.
Julie SteinestelUrology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Roman MayrUrology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Matthias HeckUrology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Christian G StiefDepartment of Urology, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.
Thilo WesthofenDepartment of Urology, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objective: High-risk prostate cancer (PCa) carries substantial risks of recurrence, metastasis, and mortality. Neoadjuvant therapy before radical prostatectomy (RP) remains investigational. The PROTEUS (NCT03767244) trial evaluates perioperative apalutamide + androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) but lacks a surgery-only control cohort. The objective of this study is to characterize oncologic outcomes in patients with PROTEUS-like high-risk PCa undergoing RP without neoadjuvant therapy. Methods: We performed a retrospective, single-center cohort study of consecutive patients fulfilling PROTEUS high-risk criteria who underwent RP with lymphadenectomy without prior ADT or neoadjuvant treatment. The primary outcome was biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCR-FS). Secondary outcomes included metastasis-free survival (MFS), event-free survival (EFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Key findings and limitations: Among 1392 patients, median follow-up was 60 mo (95% confidence interval [CI], 56-64); 67% received postoperative radiotherapy. BCR-FS at 36, 60, and 120 mo was 60% (95% CI, 57-64), 44% (95% CI, 40-49), and 22% (95% CI, 17-28), respectively. MFS was 79% (95% CI, 76-83), 71% (95% CI, 66-76), and 56% (95% CI, 47-65), respectively. EFS was 56% (95% CI, 52-60), 40% (95% CI, 36-45), and 18% (95% CI, 13-23), respectively. CSS remained high at 95.5% (95% CI, 94-97), 92% (95% CI, 90-94), and 86% (95% CI, 81-91), respectively. Limitations include the retrospective, single-center design, absence of centralized pathology review, and maturing follow-up. Conclusions and clinical implications: These findings demonstrate substantial rates of recurrence and metastatic progression despite contemporary management, underscoring the persistent unmet need in this population and providing a rationale for prospective evaluation of perioperative treatment intensification strategies such as PROTEUS.

Indexed as

Androgen deprivation therapyHigh-risk prostate cancerNeoadjuvant therapyOncologic outcomesPROTEUS trialRadical prostatectomy

Identifiers

PMID42699359
PMCPMC13543131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.