ArticleThe archives of bone and joint surgery2026
Deep Learning-based Detection of Hip Anatomical Landmarks in X-ray Images.
Article in The archives of bone and joint surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The accurate quantification of hip deformities in medical images presented a significant challenge for radiologists. Inaccurate quantifications can lead to misclassification of diseases and improper treatment. This study introduced two-stage deep learning (DL) models designed for the detection of landmarks in hip X-ray images, aiming to improve the accuracy of deformity quantification. Methods: This study employed two two-stage deep learning (DL) models based on VGG16 and ResNet50. The first stage aimed to detect the bounding box for each landmark, while the second stage focused on pinpointing the exact location of the landmark within the magnified box. The model automatically identified 16 hip landmarks and measures 12 specific dimensions on each side. Training, validation, and testing were conducted on a dataset comprising 854 3-joint lower limb X-ray images depicting various anomalies. Results: The model's measurements were compared with those obtained manually to evaluate performance. The resulting average error ranged from 0.56 to 2.33 mm for different landmarks in the ResNet50-based model. The most accurate measurements were obtained for the femoral head radius and shaft width, with average errors of 0.49 mm and 0.64 mm, respectively. Conversely, the least accurate results were observed for the alpha angle, with an error of 7.37°. Conclusion: This dataset can be valuable for diverse research endeavors related to the hip region. The 2-stage model demonstrated a brief learning time due to the small image size loaded in both steps, while also offering high precision through the use of a bounding box.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.