ArticleData in brief2026
LiDAR-derived dataset of extracted trees and shrubs from AHN4 airborne laser scanning in the Oostvaardersplassen wetland, the Netherlands.
Article in Data in brief, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article describes a geospatial dataset of trees and shrubs extracted from the fourth Dutch national airborne laser scanning (ALS) survey (AHN4) covering the Oostvaardersplassen wetland in the Netherlands. The dataset was generated in the context of the MAMBO project, which focuses on automated workflows for deriving habitat condition metrics from LiDAR data for European habitat monitoring. The input data consist of nationally acquired AHN4 point clouds (2020-2022). A dedicated processing workflow was applied to classify and extract woody vegetation points in marsh and reedbed environments, where trees and shrubs co-occur with dense herbaceous vegetation. The workflow includes (i) pre-processing and segmentation of vegetation points, (ii) clustering of tree and shrub points using neighbourhood analysis and voxel-based aggregation, and (iii) delineation of individual woody elements through seed detection and connectivity analysis in three-dimensional space. Accuracy assessments were conducted using manually created ground truth datasets derived from ALS point clouds and by referencing 8 cm resolution aerial imagery for selected validation plots and patches. The dataset includes classified ALS point clouds (LAZ), extracted tree and shrub point clouds (LAZ), derived raster products (GeoTIFF), vector boundary files (ESRI Shapefile), processing scripts, and documentation. The dataset and associated processing workflow, source code, and metadata are publicly available through Zenodo, GitHub, and the LifeWatch Metadata Catalogue. The dataset can be reused for applications such as habitat structure mapping, woody vegetation monitoring in wetlands, LiDAR-based workflow benchmarking, training and validation of classification algorithms, and upscaling of tree extraction approaches to other airborne laser scanning datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.