Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42699289›Full record

ArticleBiological psychiatry global open science2026

Refining Drug Classes: A Multidimensional, Data-Driven Map of Antidepressant Pharmacology.

Daniel Martins, Lia Fernandes, Steven C R Williams, Federico Turkheimer, Mitul A Mehta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological psychiatry global open science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniel MartinsRISE-Health, Department of Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Lia FernandesRISE-Health, Department of Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Steven C R WilliamsDepartment of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Federico TurkheimerDepartment of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Mitul A MehtaDepartment of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Traditional classifications of antidepressant medications are organized around primary molecular targets or historical development pathways. However, these categorical systems obscure substantial heterogeneity in receptor- and transporter-level pharmacology both within and across classes. Many antidepressants exhibit clinically relevant polypharmacology, engaging multiple neuromodulatory systems at biologically meaningful affinities. Therefore, we undertook a data-driven reappraisal of antidepressant pharmacology based on multidimensional ligand-target binding profiles. Methods: Experimentally measured inhibition constants (Ki) were curated from public pharmacological databases to construct receptor and transporter affinity "fingerprints" for 25 commonly prescribed antidepressants across serotonergic, dopaminergic, histaminergic, cholinergic, and adrenergic targets. Median pKi values were aggregated to generate a drug × target affinity matrix. This matrix was analyzed using unsupervised hierarchical clustering and principal component analysis, without reference to conventional therapeutic class labels. Results: Antidepressants formed a structured yet continuous pharmacological landscape organized along graded dimensions reflecting transporter selectivity versus receptor-level polypharmacology. Drugs traditionally grouped within the same class frequently diverged in their multidimensional affinity profiles, whereas compounds from different classes often clustered together. Histaminergic, muscarinic, and adrenergic targets were major contributors to the separation between broadly acting and more selective agents. Conclusions: Antidepressants are more accurately characterized by multidimensional affinity architectures than by categorical class labels. Affinity-based representations provide a mechanistically transparent framework for linking molecular pharmacology to systems-level brain function and for understanding how antidepressants engage distributed neuromodulatory systems beyond their traditionally defined primary targets.

Indexed as

AntidepressantsData-driven classificationNeuromodulatory systemsPolypharmacologyReceptor-binding affinity

Identifiers

PMID42699289
PMCPMC13544174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.