Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42699270›Full record

ArticleJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology2026

Clinical Characteristics and Novel Manometric Features of Pseudoachalasia: Identification of Loss of Respiratory Variation in Lower Esophageal Sphincter Pressure.

Eri Nishikawa, Shinwa Tanaka, Hirofumi Abe, Hiroshi Tanabe, Shinya Hoki, Hitomi Hori, Tatsuya Nakai, Chise Ueda, Satoshi Urakami, Tetsuya Yoshizaki and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Eri NishikawaDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine Kobe Hyogo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6203-6643
Shinwa TanakaDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine Kobe Hyogo Japan.
Hirofumi AbeDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine Kobe Hyogo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1938-330X
Hiroshi TanabeDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine Kobe Hyogo Japan.
Shinya HokiDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine Kobe Hyogo Japan.
Hitomi HoriDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine Kobe Hyogo Japan.
Tatsuya NakaiDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine Kobe Hyogo Japan.
Chise UedaDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine Kobe Hyogo Japan.
Satoshi UrakamiDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine Kobe Hyogo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7466-0632
Tetsuya YoshizakiDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine Kobe Hyogo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4315-4766
Takashi ToyonagaDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine Kobe Hyogo Japan.
Yuzo KodamaDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine Kobe Hyogo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1223-7147

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pseudoachalasia closely mimics idiopathic achalasia in both symptoms and high-resolution manometry (HRM) findings, making accurate diagnosis difficult. This study aimed to clarify the clinical characteristics of pseudoachalasia encountered at our institution and identify novel manometric findings specific to this condition. Methods: This single-center retrospective study compared the clinical characteristics and HRM findings of patients diagnosed with pseudoachalasia (pseudoachalasia group) with those diagnosed with idiopathic achalasia or esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO), collectively defined as the idiopathic achalasia group, between April 2015 and March 2024. Pseudoachalasia was defined as cases with no mucosal abnormalities on the initial endoscopic examination, and with clinical symptoms, esophagographic findings, and HRM results consistent with achalasia. Results: Five patients were diagnosed with pseudoachalasia. Two cases were classified as Type 2 achalasia and three as EGJOO according to the Chicago Classification. Compared with the idiopathic achalasia group, the pseudoachalasia group was older, had a shorter symptom-to-diagnosis interval, and exhibited higher Eckardt scores. HRM demonstrated significantly higher integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) in the pseudoachalasia group. Loss of Respiratory Variation in LES Pressure (LRV-LES) was observed in all patients in the pseudoachalasia group, whereas it was present in 8.3% of patients in the idiopathic achalasia group. Conclusion: Pseudoachalasia was characterized by an older age at onset, a shorter interval from symptom onset to diagnosis, and higher Eckardt scores. HRM demonstrated elevated IRP, and LRV-LES was observed in all cases. LRV-LES may represent a novel manometric finding that can aid in the diagnosis of pseudoachalasia.

Indexed as

diagnosisesophageal achalasiaesophageal motility disordersmanometry

Identifiers

PMID42699270
PMCPMC13542993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.