Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42699241›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies advances2026

Barriers and facilitators for intensive care nurses in using clinical decision support systems for intravenous Y-site compatibility in intensive care: A survey study.

Annabel Peyravi Latif, Alessio Degl'Innocenti, Bengt Nellgård, Axel Wolf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Annabel Peyravi LatifDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Alessio Degl'InnocentiRegionhälsan, Region of Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Bengt NellgårdDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Axel WolfUniversity of Gothenburg Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patients in intensive care units frequently receive multiple intravenous medications, increasing the risk of medication errors, including incompatible Y-site drug co-administration. Drug incompatibility can lead to serious clinical consequences, yet evidence supporting the safety of many commonly co-administered drug combinations is limited. Clinical decision support systems may help reduce medication errors and improve patient care, but challenges remain in their design and adaptation to complex and dynamic clinical settings such as the intensive care unit.The Swedish Y-site compatibility system was developed by pharmacists and, it is a website that enables users to assess potential Y-site compatibility between intravenously administered drug pairs. However, the website was not specifically designed for intensive care setting, where the need for this information is greatest. Objective: To identify barriers and facilitators influencing intensive care nurses' use of clinical decision support systems to enhance the safety of drug administration, with a focus on the Swedish Y-site Compatibility System. Methods: A digital survey, inspired by the BEhavior and Acceptance fRamework (BEAR), was distributed to all 296 intensive care unit nurses in clinical service at an intensive care unit at a large University Hospital in Sweden. The survey included respondent characteristics, intravenous drug administration practices, general perceptions of clinical decision support systems, and attitudes towards the Swedish Y-site compatibility system. Results: A total of 126 intensive care unit nurses (43%) responded to the survey. Among them, 67% reported administering intravenous medications without knowing if they are compatible when co-administered intravenously, and 18% reported performing such administration at least weekly. Most respondents (89%) used the Swedish Y-site compatibility system, and 82% would recommend it to others. No apparent barrier was identified among the surveys areas; social factors, clinical context, and implementation by assessing nurses' perceptions, intravenous drug administration practices, and specific feedback on the Swedish Y-site compatibility system. Identified facilitators included the perceived value of clinical decision support systems in improving intravenous medication administration and patient care. Conclusions: Intensive care unit nurses reported positive views regarding clinical decision support systems, and the Swedish Y-site compatibility system was regarded as a valuable tool in supporting safer intravenous medication administration. Despite widespread use, many nurses still administer intravenous drugs without knowing its compatibility, indicating ongoing risk and a need for targeted education, and further development of the Swedish Y-site compatibility system to tailor it to the intensive care unit setting. Registration: Not registered.

Indexed as

Clinical decision support systemsIntensive care nursesIntensive care unitIntravenous drug administrationIntravenous drug compatibilityY-site drug compatibility

Identifiers

PMID42699241
PMCPMC13542926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.