ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2026
Are fermented foods safe for human health? A systematic analysis of the literature.
Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Health benefits of fermented foods: a strategic roadmap from the PIMENTO initiative.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Fermented foods (FF) are widely consumed across different dietary cultures and are increasingly recognized for their nutritional and functional properties. Although fermentation can improve food preservation and safety, there are still concerns about microbiological and chemical hazards. Given the growing consumption of FF, it is essential to conduct a systematic evaluation of their safety to support evidence-based risk-benefit assessments. Objectives: This review aimed to establish the safety of FF for human consumption and to identify the main microbiological and chemical hazards associated with these foods, including their occurrence, exposure and potential risks. Design: A systematic scoping review was conducted in accordance with a predefined protocol aligned with PRISMA principles. Relevant human studies were identified through searches of the PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane Library databases. The eligibility criteria were defined using a PECO framework and included all population groups and a broad range of FF across major food categories. Alcoholic beverages with an alcohol content above 1.25% were excluded. The outcomes included the occurrence of hazards, associated exposure and risk, and reported foodborne outbreaks. Results: Microbiological hazards were predominantly associated with pathogens such as Conclusion: Overall, the identified risks associated with FF are predominantly driven by contaminated raw materials, inadequate processing practices, and environmental factors, rather than by fermentation itself, supporting the safe integration of FF into modern diets when appropriate hygienic and technological conditions are ensured. These findings emphasize the importance of targeted risk management strategies focused on raw material quality, process control and harmonized risk assessment approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.