Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42699075›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026

Rear impact responses of 50th percentile female and male dummies in a seat with different whiplash injury risk reduction for women and men.

Anna Carlsson, Anders Kullgren, Mats Y Svensson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anna CarlssonChalmers Industriteknik, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Anders KullgrenVehicle Safety Division, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Mats Y SvenssonVehicle Safety Division, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the difference in rear impact dynamic response between a male and a female crash test dummy, in Saab 9-3 seats fitted with the Saab Active Head Restraint (SAHR) whiplash injury mitigation system. According to real world injury data, this SAHR system offers a greater risk reduction for the male population in comparison to the female. Identifying response differences between the male and female dummies, could explain the risk differences seen in real world crashes. Six sled tests were performed in Saab 9-3 seats (model year 1998-2002) in accordance with the European New Car Assessment Programme (Euro NCAP) whiplash test procedure (medium pulse, Δv 16 km/h, max acceleration 10 g). Two different low speed rear impact crash test dummies were used for the tests; the 50th percentile female prototype BioRID P50F_V2 and the 50th percentile male BioRID II. Both dummies exhibited early Head Restraint (HR) contact times which resulted in Neck Injury Criterion (NIC) values well below the recommended limit of 15 m

Indexed as

crash test dummyfemalesinjury riskNIC protractionrear impactsled testingWADwhiplash

Identifiers

PMID42699075
PMCPMC13542634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.