ReviewTherapeutic advances in hematology2026
From toxicity to immunity: Evaluating CAR-T and conventional therapies in multiple myeloma through quality-adjusted life year (QALY) outcomes.
Review in Therapeutic advances in hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM) remains characterized by recurrent relapse and cumulative treatment burden despite major therapeutic advances. This study compared conventional stepwise regimens with CAR-T cell therapy in terms of QoL, toxicity, cost, and ethical considerations within a model-based comparative framework. This comparative pharmacoeconomic modeling analysis was based on published clinical trial data. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were digitized to estimate mean overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) using area-under-the-curve integration. Treatment costs were calculated based on published pricing and trial-derived treatment durations. A simple and transparent ECOG-based utility model was developed to enable clinicians, researchers, and health policy authorities to estimate quality-adjusted life years (QALY) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) across regimens spanning heterogeneous treatment lines. The present analysis synthesizes outcome data from 19 pivotal trials and real-world cohorts (N = 7,793 patients). Among heavily pretreated patients, CAR-T therapy approximately doubled OS and PFS compared with other late-line regimens and yielded higher QALY estimates with lower cumulative treatment burden. Daratumumab-based combinations improved outcomes but reached very high costs (∼USD 1 million/patient), while carfilzomib-based regimens remained costly but clinically important for high-risk disease. VMP represented a practical lower-cost option for transplant-ineligible or resource-limited patients. In treatment-line-stratified analysis, later-line/RRMM regimens had higher median ICER-equivalent values than early-line/induction regimens (USD 739,050/QALY vs USD 218,687/QALY; 3.4-fold higher), whereas CAR-T regimens showed a median ICER-equivalent estimate of USD 299,723/QALY, approximately 2.5-fold lower than later-line/RRMM conventional regimens. Within this model-based comparative framework, CAR-T provided substantial survival and quality-adjusted outcome gains after three or more prior therapy lines, with promising potential for earlier use. Despite its upfront single-payment structure, CAR-T did not show a disproportionate ICER-equivalent burden compared with later-line conventional regimens. However, limited global availability raises ethical concerns regarding access, infrastructure, reimbursement, and equity. Further studies incorporating longer follow-up and patient-level QoL data are needed to refine its role in multiple myeloma care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.