ArticleJournal of ophthalmology2026
Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy, Safety, and Corneal Dynamics of Overnight Orthokeratology in Teenagers and Adults With Myopia: A Prospective, Open-Label Study in Taiwan.
Article in Journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Myopia is a global public health concern, and its prevalence has been increasing year by year worldwide. Orthokeratology uses gas-permeable contact lenses to reshape the corneal contour and correct low-to-moderate myopia. Orthokeratology has also been shown to reduce myopia progression in children. For adults, ortho-K lenses remain a viable option for myopia correction; however, their usage rate is relatively low due to maintenance difficulties and safety concerns. To date, few studies have compared the efficacy, safety, and corneal dynamics of ortho-K use between teenagers and adults. Methods: Subjects with myopia of either sex aged between 12 and 65 years were enrolled in this prospective open-label study. The subjects were fitted with Progressive Boston Orthokeratology Shaping Lenses for overnight wear and were instructed to wear (before going to sleep) the lenses for > 7 h each night and remove them in the morning, for 9 months. Manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) and uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) were assessed. Results: Overall, 68 subjects (134 eyes) completed the study, and of these, 15 (22.06%) subjects were teenagers (≤ 19 years) and 53 (77.94%) subjects were adults (> 19 years). In the teenager and adult groups, the mean MRSE changed from -2.84 D and -3.31 D at baseline to approximately 0.0 D in both groups at 9 months. UCVA improved significantly in both groups, reaching approximately Snellen 20/20 (logMAR 0) within the first few weeks of treatment and remaining stable throughout the study period. No clinically significant increases in intraocular pressure were observed during treatment, and endothelial cell density remained clinically stable. Mild corneal staining occurred in a small number of examinations and resolved with conservative management. After discontinuation, both MRSE and UCVA in both groups quickly returned to baseline by Week 4. Conclusion: These findings suggest that orthokeratology is an effective option for temporary correction of low-to-moderate myopia in both teenagers and adults. Within the limitations of the sample size, orthokeratology may be considered a safe and effective myopia correction option for adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.