ReviewiScience2026
Extracellular vesicles for liquid biopsy in major depressive disorder: Human evidence and clinical translation.
Review in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Major depressive disorder is diagnosed through clinical interview and symptom-based criteria. The search for peripheral biomarkers that might complement this assessment has identified extracellular vesicles (EVs) as a promising liquid biopsy platform, as they carry microRNAs, proteins, and other molecular cargo that may reflect disease-relevant biology. This narrative review critically appraises the human studies examining EV abundance, size, miRNA cargo, and protein profiles in MDD. We examine how pre-analytical variability, inconsistent isolation methods, and uncertain brain-enrichment specificity have limited cross-study convergence and independent replication. Translational readiness is evaluated against established biomarker development frameworks, from analytical validity through clinical utility. We argue that EV profiling should be integrated with clinical phenotyping, neuroimaging, and digital measures within precision psychiatry rather than deployed as a standalone diagnostic tool, and we outline a roadmap for standardization, multicenter validation, and clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.