ArticleJDS communications2026
Dairy sire mating recommendations to limit extremes and target intermediate optima.
Article in JDS communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional genetic selection using total merit indexes operates under the simple assumption that higher is better. Some traits, however, are subject to preferred upper or lower thresholds and some may have intermediate optima. Therefore, mating recommender systems should consider these herd-specific breeding goals. Mating recommendations in this study were performed at a herd level for dairy cattle using a constrained optimization approach based on simulated estimates of genetic merit for 9 traits or subindexes. A total of 10,000 herds, each with 200 females, were simulated. The top 100 sires from a simulated population were chosen to represent the pool of candidate sires. Within each herd separately, candidate female-male pairings were evaluated on a mate utility function that combined parental average genetic merit for the 9 traits or subindexes. The utility function penalized matings expected to generate progeny exceeding predefined thresholds (milk yield was used as an example trait) or deviating from an intermediate optimum (cow liveweight was used as an example trait), thereby reflecting both avoidance of genetic extremes and targeting of biologically and system-relevant optima. Imposing a linear penalty on the parental average genetic merit for a trait exceeding a given threshold reduced, considerably, the number of recommended matings that had a parental average genetic merit exceeding that threshold. For the vast majority of herds, no mating that exceeded that parental average genetic merit threshold was recommended but it was unavoidable in some herds because of the presence of females with extreme genetic merit for the trait and the absence of sires capable of delivering the desired parental average genetic merit. Including the threshold penalty had minimal effect on the mean total merit index of the recommended matings. Preselection of candidate dams before mating recommendations, although slightly reducing the proportion of progeny exceeding the threshold, resulted in a lower mean total merit index of the recommended matings. Penalizing matings that generated parental averages deviating from an intermediate optimum resulted in recommended matings that, although lower in genetic merit for the total merit index, were more homogeneous in parental average for the trait in question. Although preselecting dams for mating consideration did not alter the proportion of matings deviating from the optimum, it resulted in a lower mean total merit of the matings. Although the specific conclusions of the present study are dependent on the simulated population, the overarching finding is that developing a utility function that penalizes matings exceeding defined thresholds or deviating from desired optima can support mating recommendations aligned with herd-specific breeding goals that are nonlinear in nature.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.