Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42698905›Full record

ArticleJDS communications2026

Bioavailability of rumen-protected L-methionine supplement in lactating dairy cows.

Rafael A Menezes, Nancy L Whitehouse, Dani O'Bryan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JDS communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rafael A MenezesDepartment of Agriculture, Nutrition, and Food Systems, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824.
Nancy L WhitehouseDepartment of Agriculture, Nutrition, and Food Systems, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824.
Dani O'BryanBerg+Schmidt Animal Nutrition, Aurora, IL 60502.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rumen-protected AA are largely used to supply the MP in dairy diets. Rumen-protected methionine (RP-Met) supplements differ in their proportion of the biologically active L-form isomer and in their bioavailability. Based on the plasma free AA dose-response approach, we determined the bioavailability of L-Met60 (LipoAktiv L-methionine 60), a rumen-protected L-Met supplement, and evaluated its effects on plasma AA profile. Ten multiparous Holstein cows in mid lactation were used in a replicated 5 × 5 Latin square design with 7-d experimental periods. All treatments used L-Met60, with doses and routes of administration as follows: 0 (control), 18 (18IL), or 36 (36IL) g/d supplied by continuous abomasal infusion, and 18 (18FL) or 36 (36FL) g/d as a fed supplement mixed in the TMR. Abomasal infusion was delivered continuously and uniformly into the abomasum via rumen cannula using a peristaltic pump, whereas fed L-Met60 was consumed before each meal. Milk and blood samples were collected during the last 3 d of the covariate and the experimental periods. No treatment effects were observed for animal performance, except for a discrete increase of 0.06 percentage units in milk protein for 36IL. Infused and fed L-Met60 supplementation did not affect plasma metabolites, but altered plasma Met, cystine, cystathionine and allocystathionine, glutamine, taurine, and total sulfur AA (TSAA). These changes, especially for taurine and glutamine, might be explained by a higher activation of the transsulfuration pathway. Plasma TSAA increased linearly with both routes of administration; however, the regression analysis showed steeper slope for abomasal infusion than for the fed supplementation. Based on this response, the relative bioavailability of L-Met60 was calculated as 43.4 ± 2.5% (TSAA, % of [total AA - TSAA]).

Identifiers

PMID42698905
PMCPMC13542420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.