ArticleHealth science reports2026
Predicting Insecticide-Treated Net Use Among Under-Five Children in Tanzania Using Machine Learning: Evidence From the 2022 Tanzania DHS.
Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Malaria remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in sub-Saharan Africa, disproportionately affecting children under five. In Tanzania, where malaria accounts for a significant share of pediatric deaths, the use of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) is a cornerstone of prevention. However, despite widespread ITN distribution, usage remains suboptimal due to socioeconomic and behavioral factors. This study applied machine learning (ML) methods to predict ITN usage among under-five children in Tanzania using nationally representative survey data. Methods: We utilized data from the 2022 Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey (TDHS), comprising 8,319 women with complete information relevant to ITN use. Six supervised ML models-Random Forest, Bagging, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), Naïve Bayes, and Logistic Regression-were developed to predict ITN usage. The dataset was split into training (70%) and testing (30%) sets. Class imbalance was addressed using Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique, and model performance was evaluated using AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV. Feature importance was assessed using the Mean Decrease in Gini index. Results: The Random Forest model achieved the highest performance (AUC = 0.90, accuracy = 87%, sensitivity = 90%, specificity = 75%), followed closely by Bagging and SVM models. Key predictors of ITN use included wealth index, education level, region, and mosquito net ownership. Socioeconomic and geographic disparities were the strongest contributors to variations in ITN utilization, while pregnancy status and household size were less influential. Conclusion: Machine learning offers a powerful approach for identifying determinants of ITN use and targeting high-risk populations. This study demonstrates the potential of predictive modeling to enhance malaria prevention strategies in Tanzania and similar endemic settings. Future work should integrate geospatial and longitudinal data and explore operationalization through digital decision-support systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.