Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42698891›Full record

ReviewJB & JS open access

A Novel Orthopaedic Resident Education Curriculum: Implementation of the Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Resident Orthopaedic Core Knowledge Platform.

Joshua T Bram, Mark F Megerian, Austin C Kaidi, Daniel W Green, Duretti T Fufa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joshua T BramHospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3913-2804
Mark F MegerianHospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9872-700X
Austin C KaidiHospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4434-6033
Daniel W GreenHospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7286-6864
Duretti T FufaHospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Traditional orthopaedic residency educational approaches rely on unstandardized lecture series and self-directed study, which can lead to inconsistencies in knowledge acquisition. The Residency Orthopaedic Core Knowledge (ROCK) curriculum, introduced by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons in 2022, is a structured, comprehensive framework designed to standardize orthopaedic education. This study evaluates resident satisfaction with implementation of the ROCK curriculum within a single orthopaedic residency program and its association with resident performance on the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination (OITE). Methods: A 2-year residency didactics curriculum was designed to incorporate the ROCK curriculum at a single, urban academic orthopaedic residency program with a wider breadth of topics starting in the 2023 to 2024 academic year. To assess pre-/post-implementation response to this change, a survey assessing resident attitudes toward lectures/study patterns was designed. This was administered at the end of the 2022-23 academic year (pre-ROCK), with responses also collected 1 (2023-24) and 2 (2024-25) years after implementation. The survey captured resident demographics, attendance patterns, content satisfaction, and study habits. Questionnaire answers and OITE scores were compared between the year 2022 to 2023 (pre-ROCK) and the years 2023 to 2025 (post-ROCK). Results: A total of 78 responses were recorded over the 3 years (63% male) out of a potential 135 respondents. The proportion of residents who agreed that conferences were high quality (93% vs. 70%, p = 0.013) and were satisfied with conferences (91% vs. 65%, p = 0.006) was greater with the ROCK curriculum. In addition, residents felt there was a more appropriate balance of case-/didactic-based lectures after implementation (86% vs. 57%, p = 0.006). With the new curriculum, program OITE percentile increased from 68th percentile in 2022 (pre-ROCK) to 79th percentile in both 2023 and 2024 to 83rd percentile in 2025. Conclusions: Integrating the ROCK curriculum into an orthopaedic residency didactics curriculum led to high resident satisfaction and an overall trend toward higher OITE scores. These results support the use of the ROCK curriculum to augment resident education. Orthopaedic program directors and education leaders alike can replicate or adapt our proposed lecture schedule.

Identifiers

PMID42698891
PMCPMC13542055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.