Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42698884›Full record

ArticleVeterinary and animal science2026

Elucidating the perception, awareness and biosecurity practices among the live poultry and poultry-meat sellers to mitigate the risk of zoonotic salmonellosis.

Mirza Mienur Meher, Marya Afrin, Abdullah Al Bayazid, Nashib Parajuli, Md Sohel Rahman, Md Sayedul Islam, Md Zulfekar Ali, Md Mominul Islam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary and animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mirza Mienur MeherDepartment of Microbiology and Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Gazipur Agricultural University, Gazipur 1706, Bangladesh.
Marya AfrinDepartment of Anatomy and Histology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh.
Abdullah Al BayazidDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Gazipur Agricultural University, Gazipur 1706, Bangladesh.
Nashib ParajuliFaculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Gazipur Agricultural University, Gazipur 1706, Bangladesh.
Md Sohel RahmanFaculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Gazipur Agricultural University, Gazipur 1706, Bangladesh.
Md Sayedul IslamDepartment of Microbiology and Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Gazipur Agricultural University, Gazipur 1706, Bangladesh.
Md Zulfekar AliAnimal Health Research Division, Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute, Savar, Dhaka 1341, Bangladesh.
Md Mominul IslamDepartment of Pathology, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zoonotic salmonellosis remains a major public health concern, especially in low-resource settings. Biosecurity measure of live poultry and poultry-meat vending shop is necessary to address zoonoses. This study investigated the knowledge, attitudes, and biosecurity practices of poultry and poultry-meat sellers toward the risk of zoonotic salmonellosis in Bangladesh. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 432 poultry and poultry-meat sellers using a structured questionnaire. A multistage sampling approach was utilized to select participants. Majority of the participants were male (75.5%), age between 26-34 years (31.9%), had primary education (28.9%), experience of ≤5 years in poultry and poultry-meat selling (40.3%), and monthly income was <20000 Bangladesh Taka (BDT) (∼US$163.40) (43.3%). Additionally, minimal sellers had training on live poultry marketing (33.1%), and poultry-meat processing along with marketing (28.5%). Poultry and poultry-meat sellers of 33.34% and 62.03% had the good knowledge and positive attitudes respectively. While 41.43% were involved in appropriate biosecurity practice. Moreover, the mean knowledge, attitude, and practice scores were 53.12±0.89%, 68.59±0.79%, and 54.58±0.73%, respectively. Multivariate analyses, higher education was a strong predictor of good knowledge (Bachelor's degree: OR=6.64, 95%CI:2.59-17.04, p<0.01), positive attitude (Bachelor's degree: OR=13.48, 95%CI:3.72-48.87, p<0.01), and appropriate biosecurity practices (HS: OR=5.52, 95%CI:2.62-11.63, p<0.01). Sellers with good knowledge, positive attitudes, and appropriate biosecurity practices perceived higher zoonotic risk (median=7, p<0.05), with perception co-relation that significantly (p<0.01) influenced by education (r=0.131) and training (r=0.084). However, notable gaps in safe practices highlighting the need for training that enhances risk perception through applied knowledge, promotes awareness by changing attitudes, and hands-on biosecurity skills.

Indexed as

BiosecurityFoodborne diseaseHygieneMeat safetyWet marketZoonoses

Identifiers

PMID42698884
PMCPMC13543086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.