ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2026
Induced pluripotent stem cell reprogramming: methodological evolution and challenges in clinical translation.
Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cell reprogramming can transform somatic cells into induced pluripotent stem cells providing a platform for patient-specific disease modeling, drug screening and regenerative medicine research. Since the advent of OKSM-mediated reprogramming, the system of technical approaches has evolved continuously - from integrated viral vectors to non-integrated episomal systems and, more recently, chemical reprogramming and CRISPR approaches. The simultaneous advances in single-cell multi-omics, biomaterials engineering, and artificial intelligence have further refined the controllability and precision of the reprogramming process. Despite these innovations, problems persist that hinder clinical translation: incomplete epigenetic resetting, ongoing clonal heterogeneity, genomic instability in long-term culture, and the lack of standardized Good Manufacturing Practice protocols for large-scale manufacturing. This review summarizes the trajectory of iPSC reprogramming technologies, with special emphasis on the translational applicability of each modality. We evaluated viral and nonviral delivery systems, chemical reprogramming, strategies that aid gene editing, and emerging engineering platforms, including microfluidics, smart biomaterials, and artificial-intelligence-driven process optimization. We further identify the core "translational triltrilas", namely, the inherent tradeoffs between security, homogeneity, and scalability, and propose a comprehensive strategy to overcome these bottlenecks. By linking basic mechanistic understandings with industrial and regulatory considerations, this review aims to provide a route for transitioning iPSC technology from a laboratory tool to a clinically viable manufacturing platform.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.