Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42698795›Full record

ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2026

Infection-embedded penicillin allergy de-labelling delivers immediate antimicrobial stewardship gains in patients with active infection.

Stephanie Harris, Akish Luintel, Sarah Jones, Gabriella Hardy-Gould, Neil Reynolds, Preet Panesar, Melina Makatsori, Joanna Lukawska, Indran Balakrishnan, Alex Kew and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Stephanie HarrisDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK.
Akish LuintelDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK.
Sarah JonesDepartment of Pharmacy, University College London Hospitals, London, UK.
Gabriella Hardy-GouldDepartment of Pharmacy, University College London Hospitals, London, UK.
Neil ReynoldsDepartment of Pharmacy, University College London Hospitals, London, UK.
Preet PanesarDepartment of Pharmacy, University College London Hospitals, London, UK.
Melina MakatsoriDepartment of Specialist Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK.
Joanna LukawskaDepartment of Specialist Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK.
Indran BalakrishnanDepartment of Microbiology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Alex KewDepartment of Microbiology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Cassandra WatsonDepartment of Pharmacy, London North-West University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6329-8199
Alastair McGregorDepartment of Infectious Diseases, London North-West University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Vanya GantDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6985-4969
Trupti PatelDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK.
Abhishek DasDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8798-035X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Unconfirmed penicillin allergy labels restrict antibiotic options and drive deviation from antimicrobial guidelines. To address this, we established an infection-embedded penicillin allergy de-labelling (PADL) service embedded within existing infection-liaison touchpoints (microbiology meetings, advice calls and infection reviews) to target patients with active infection needs. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of all 189 referrals to our PADL service (March 2022 to December 2025), nested within a baseline prevalence review of 218 375 admissions. Furthermore, to quantify the clinical cost of allergy labels, we surveyed infection experts, using 20 clinical vignettes, to determine prescribing variance had de-labelling not occurred. Results: Of patients, 82.5% (156/189) were classified as having acute, complex or recurrent infection; 45% (85/189) were directly de-labelled, while 41.8% (79/189) were excluded by low-risk criteria prompting specialist referral for full penicillin allergy testing. Critically, for patients on active therapy, de-labelling triggered an immediate regimen change in 84.1%, driving a 43% intravenous-to-oral switch rate, a mean reduction of 0.7 antibiotics per patient and significantly reducing antibiotic spectrum coverage ( Conclusions: Infection-embedded de-labelling is a high-yield intervention that can deliver immediate stewardship returns in patients with active infection needs. A caveat is that a significant proportion of excluded patients require specialist allergy referral, carrying resource implications and underscoring the need for careful planning with local allergy services at inception of 'low-risk' pathways.

Identifiers

PMID42698795
PMCPMC13542713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.