ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2026
Infection-embedded penicillin allergy de-labelling delivers immediate antimicrobial stewardship gains in patients with active infection.
Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Unconfirmed penicillin allergy labels restrict antibiotic options and drive deviation from antimicrobial guidelines. To address this, we established an infection-embedded penicillin allergy de-labelling (PADL) service embedded within existing infection-liaison touchpoints (microbiology meetings, advice calls and infection reviews) to target patients with active infection needs. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of all 189 referrals to our PADL service (March 2022 to December 2025), nested within a baseline prevalence review of 218 375 admissions. Furthermore, to quantify the clinical cost of allergy labels, we surveyed infection experts, using 20 clinical vignettes, to determine prescribing variance had de-labelling not occurred. Results: Of patients, 82.5% (156/189) were classified as having acute, complex or recurrent infection; 45% (85/189) were directly de-labelled, while 41.8% (79/189) were excluded by low-risk criteria prompting specialist referral for full penicillin allergy testing. Critically, for patients on active therapy, de-labelling triggered an immediate regimen change in 84.1%, driving a 43% intravenous-to-oral switch rate, a mean reduction of 0.7 antibiotics per patient and significantly reducing antibiotic spectrum coverage ( Conclusions: Infection-embedded de-labelling is a high-yield intervention that can deliver immediate stewardship returns in patients with active infection needs. A caveat is that a significant proportion of excluded patients require specialist allergy referral, carrying resource implications and underscoring the need for careful planning with local allergy services at inception of 'low-risk' pathways.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.