ArticleRwanda journal of medicine and health sciences2026
Birth Spacing and Undernutrition among Children Under Five Years in Rwanda: A Secondary Data Analysis of RDHS 2019/2020.
Article in Rwanda journal of medicine and health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Short birth intervals have been linked with increased childhood undernutrition, yet evidence in Rwanda remains limited. Using data from the 2019/2020 Rwanda Demographic and Health Survey (RDHS), this study assessed the association between birth spacing and undernutrition among children under five years. Methods: This cross-sectional study utilized weighted data from 3,815 children under five from the 2019/2020 RDHS. Undernutrition was defined as either stunting, underweight, or wasting. Birth spacing was categorized as short (<24 months), intermediate (24 - 35 months), and optimal (≥36 months) and multivariable model was used to examine the association. Results: The prevalence of undernutrition was 34.1%, and most (69.1%) had a birth interval ≥ 36 months. After adjusting for confounders, optimal birth spacing was associated with lower odds of undernutrition (AOR: 0.8; 95% CI: 0.6-0.9, p = 0.034). In addition, undernutrition was significantly associated with children from poor households, children of mothers with no education or primary education, and male children, while children of married or cohabiting mothers had lower odds of undernutrition. Conclusion: Optimal birth spacing is associated with lower odds of child undernutrition. Public health policies should strengthen access and utilization of family planning services, maternal education, and socioeconomic support to enhance child nutrition outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.