ArticleRwanda journal of medicine and health sciences2026
State of Knowledge and Awareness of Preconception Preparedness among Premarital Couples in Rwanda: A Quantitative Cross-Sectional Survey.
Article in Rwanda journal of medicine and health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Preconception preparedness (PP) is important for improving maternal and neonatal health outcomes by promoting health optimization before conception. However, awareness remains limited in sub-Saharan Africa. Furthermore, evidence on premarital couples as a distinct population is scarce. Aim: To assess the status, including level of knowledge and awareness (KA), of PP and identify associated factors among premarital couples in Rwanda. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted between May and July 2024 among 600 couples (n = 1,200) recruited from civil and religious marriage registration offices in 15 districts of Rwanda. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire and analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows version 29 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA). Descriptive statistics, independent t-tests, and multiple logistic regression were used to examine KA levels and associated factors. Results: The mean participant age was 29.5 years (SD, 5.5), 91.2% of participants demonstrated low PP KA, while only 8.8% had fair KA. At the couple level, 95.3% of them had both partners in the low KA category. Females were more likely than males to demonstrate fair KA (12.0% vs. 2.8%). Other factors associated with fair KA included female sex (AOR = 2.1; p = 0.007), secondary or higher education (AOR = 6.3; p = 0.004), and urban residence (AOR = 1.7; p = 0.009). Prior exposure to PP information was uncommon (3.3%) but was associated with higher odds of fair KA (AOR = 3.3; p = 0.002). Conclusion: Knowledge and awareness of PP are low among the majority of premarital couples in Rwanda. Strengthening community-based educational interventions, integrating PP into premarital counseling, and expanding information dissemination are needed to improve preconception health literacy among couples preparing for parenthood.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.