Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42698732›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2026

Discrepancy in applied tidal volumes between t-piece and lung level during delivery room stabilization - a case report.

Alexia Zanghi, Maria Wall, David G Tingay, Andreas W Flemmer, Vincent D Gaertner

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alexia Zanghi *Division Neonatology Department of Pediatrics, Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, LMU Medizin, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Maria Wall *Division Neonatology Department of Pediatrics, Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, LMU Medizin, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
David G TingayNeonatal Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Andreas W FlemmerDivision Neonatology Department of Pediatrics, Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, LMU Medizin, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Vincent D GaertnerDivision Neonatology Department of Pediatrics, Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, LMU Medizin, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present data of a preterm infant at 28 4/7 weeks gestation with inadequate response to non-invasive ventilation after birth who was intubated five minutes after delivery. During non-invasive stabilization, we noted a discrepancy between the displayed tidal volumes on the respiratory function monitor (RFM) and the real-time electrical impedance tomography (EIT) measurements. While expiratory tidal volumes on the RFM were in the recommended target of 4-6 mL/kg, EIT showed only minimal tidal volumes (corresponding to approximately 1-3 mL/kg), which was more consistent with the clinical impression of the neonate. After intubation, tidal volumes shown on RFM and EIT were similar, suggesting that RFM may be unreliable during non-invasive ventilation, possibly due to the large compliance of the nasopharyngeal space. EIT may be a helpful additional clinical tool in selective cases in the delivery room.

Indexed as

case reportdelivery roomelectrical impedance tomographyneonatal resuscitationrespiratory function monitor

Identifiers

PMID42698732
PMCPMC13541756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.