ReviewJuntendo medical journal2026
Granulomonocytapheresis for Sepsis: Mechanistic Rationale, Therapeutic Potential, and Potential Concerns in Thromboinflammatory Critical Illness.
Review in Juntendo medical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Granulomonocytapheresis (GMA) is an extracorporeal leukocyte adsorption therapy that selectively removes activated granulocytes and monocytes through interactions involving Fcγ receptors (FcγR) and complement receptor 3 (CR3). Initially developed for chronic inflammatory diseases such as ulcerative colitis, GMA has recently attracted attention as a potential adjunctive therapy for sepsis. Contemporary understanding of sepsis emphasizes thromboinflammation, immunothrombosis, endothelial injury, and inflammatory cell death as central mechanisms underlying organ dysfunction. Activated FcγR-positive and CR3-positive myeloid cells contribute to cytokine storm, neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation, oxidative injury, coagulation activation, and release of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). These processes amplify endothelial dysfunction, microvascular thrombosis, and disseminated intravascular coagulation. GMA may interrupt these self-amplifying inflammatory and thromboinflammatory loops by selectively depleting activated inflammatory leukocytes while relatively preserving adaptive immunity. Mechanistically, removal of FcγR-positive cells may suppress inflammasome activation, pyroptosis, and DAMP-mediated cytokine amplification, whereas removal of CR3-positive cells may attenuate NETosis, oxidative burst, endothelial adhesion, and microvascular injury. Although preliminary clinical and experimental studies suggest potential benefits in sepsis, important concerns remain regarding patient selection, optimal timing, infection risk, thrombocytopenia, and cost-effectiveness. Further phenotype-oriented clinical trials are required to define the therapeutic role of GMA in sepsis and thromboinflammatory critical illness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42698727PMC13542654What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.