ArticleJPGN reports2026
Direct clinician-pathologist multidisciplinary review and diagnostic revision in children with gastrointestinal disorders.
Article in JPGN reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate pediatric gastrointestinal (GI) diagnosis often depends on integrating clinical, endoscopic, and histopathologic information. We evaluated the impact of weekly face-to-face multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings on diagnosis in children undergoing endoscopy or liver biopsy at a tertiary center. This single-center study included 53 patients discussed between March and November 2025; because 6 children were reviewed twice, the analysis was case-based (59 MDT discussions). Diagnostic change was defined as any revision, reclassification, refinement, or exclusion of a suspected diagnosis after MDT review. Overall, diagnosis changed in 12 of 59 cases (20.3%). Endoscopic classifications changed significantly after MDT discussion (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.