Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42698716›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026

Integrating predictive models and GWAS to identify candidate loci and genes for agronomic traits in rice.

Qiang Zhou, Fujuan Wang, Yanlin Yang, Liping Dong, Yongrun Cao, Shumei Li, Guofang Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Qiang ZhouCollege of Agriculture, Xinyang Agriculture and Forestry University, Xinyang, China.
Fujuan WangCollege of Agriculture, Xinyang Agriculture and Forestry University, Xinyang, China.
Yanlin YangCollege of Agriculture, Xinyang Agriculture and Forestry University, Xinyang, China.
Liping DongCollege of Agriculture, Xinyang Agriculture and Forestry University, Xinyang, China.
Yongrun CaoCollege of Agriculture, Xinyang Agriculture and Forestry University, Xinyang, China.
Shumei LiCollege of Agriculture, Xinyang Agriculture and Forestry University, Xinyang, China.
Guofang ZhangCollege of Agriculture, Xinyang Agriculture and Forestry University, Xinyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rice is a staple crop whose improvement relies on breeding advances; precision agriculture demands predictive loci/genes for agronomic traits to innovate rice production. To cut experimental costs and boost efficiency, this study built predictive models using seedling leaf metabolomes to forecast rice agronomic traits and decode trait correlations. We integrated 11 agronomic traits and 840 metabolites from 524 rice germplasms, plus 17 agronomic traits of 3,000 varieties. Five algorithms (RF, LightGBM, SWR, LASSO, CART) were combined to build multi-model prediction systems, offsetting defects of single models for accurate complex trait prediction. GWAS on predicted phenotypes detected nine genetic hotspots. Results showed LASSO and CART had weak generalization, while LightGBM, RF and SWR delivered trait-specific predictive performance. Seven candidate genes within hotspots were validated via variation annotation, haplotype and tissue expression analyses. Distinct from laborious, environment-prone traditional phenotyping, these models realize rapid, stable high-throughput trait prediction via early metabolic markers. The uncovered loci and genes lay groundwork for dissecting molecular regulatory networks linking rice agronomy and metabolism.

Indexed as

agronomic traitsGWASmetabolitespredictive modelsrice

Identifiers

PMID42698716
PMCPMC13541722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.