Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42698608›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Screen time and cardiorespiratory fitness in school-aged children: a sex-specific association independent of physical activity-evidence from Croatia.

Marko Badrić, Leona Roca Badrić, Ivana Nikolić, Dario Novak, Snježana Mraković

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marko BadrićFaculty of Teacher Education, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Leona Roca BadrićFaculty of Teacher Education, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Ivana NikolićFaculty of Teacher Education, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Dario NovakFaculty of Kinesiology, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Snježana MrakovićFaculty of Teacher Education, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Excessive screen time has become an increasingly prevalent form of sedentary behavior among school-aged children and may adversely affect various health indicators, including cardiorespiratory fitness. However, the relationship between screen time and cardiorespiratory fitness remains inconsistent in the literature, particularly when overall physical activity is considered. This study aimed to examine the association between screen time and cardiorespiratory fitness in school-aged children while controlling for total physical activity and to determine whether sex differences exist in this relationship. Methods: A total of 306 school-aged children (163 girls, 143 boys; mean age 9.89 ± 0.60 years) participated in this cross-sectional study. Cardiorespiratory fitness was assessed using the 20 m shuttle run test, and maximal oxygen uptake (VO Results: Results indicate a significant main effect of screen time on VO Conclusion: These findings suggest that excessive screen time may be associated with lower cardiorespiratory fitness in children, independent of overall physical activity levels, particularly among boys. These findings support public health strategies aimed at limiting excessive recreational screen time while promoting regular physical activity among children.

Indexed as

Cardiorespiratory FitnessExerciseScreen TimeChildCroatiaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleOxygen ConsumptionSedentary BehaviorSex FactorsSurveys and Questionnaires20 m shuttle run testaerobic capacityhealthsedentary behaviorVO2 max

Identifiers

PMID42698608
PMCPMC13541656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.