Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42698590›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Students' experiences of using ChatGPT for English language learning: a qualitative study in a Malaysian higher education institution.

Nagaletchimee Annamalai, Mohamed Nasor, Arathai Din Eak, Amer Ayada Ayoub Alkubaisy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nagaletchimee AnnamalaiDepartment of Languages and Culture, College of Humanities and Sciences, Ajman University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.
Mohamed NasorDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Ajman University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.
Arathai Din EakSchool of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, Wawasan Open University, Penang, Malaysia.
Amer Ayada Ayoub AlkubaisyDepartment of Languages and Culture, College of Humanities and Sciences, Ajman University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A qualitative thematic analysis was conducted with 25 students from a Malaysian institution to gain a deeper understanding of their motivation for using ChatGPT in English language learning. The study employed Self-Determination Theory (SDT) and the results demonstrated that ChatGPT has the potential to contribute positively to aspects related to English language competence, social connections, and independent learning processes. Therefore, ChatGPT emerges as a helpful resource for enhancing grammar, writing, and conversational tasks, allowing educators to prioritize higher order thinking abilities and intricate areas of language training. The results suggest that ChatGPT supports learners' autonomy, relatedness, and competence, which are key components of Self-Determination Theory (SDT). Nevertheless, the study also highlighted certain obstacles, such as ChatGPT's tendency to produce erroneous or nonsensical information and its restricted capacity to ensure the accuracy of content in language learning situations. These findings emphasize the need for focused efforts to tackle these difficulties. Educators must acknowledge the limitations of the tool and complement ChatGPT interactions with human interactions to provide a comprehensive and efficient language learning experience.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceChatGPTEnglish language learninghigher educationqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID42698590
PMCPMC13541550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.