ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Impact of supine vs. hip- and knee-flexed position on anteroposterior diameter and inclination of the female pelvic outlet: an MRI-based 3D reconstruction study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Maternal positioning influences pelvic biomechanics during labor; however, the anatomical mechanisms underlying position-related pelvic morphological changes remain incompletely understood. This study aimed to quantitatively evaluate pelvic morphological changes associated with a hip- and knee-flexed position compared with the supine position using three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction. Methods: In total, 27 nulliparous non-pregnant women underwent pelvic MRI examinations in both the supine and hip- and knee-flexed positions. A radiation-free MRI-based 3D reconstruction approach was used to measure pelvic diameters and angles. A total of 12 pelvic parameters were evaluated, including the pelvic inlet, midpelvis, outlet, external pelvic measurements, and pelvic inclination. Data normality was assessed before paired-samples t-tests were performed, and intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated to assess measurement reliability. Results: Compared with the supine position, the hip- and knee-flexed position significantly increased the anteroposterior diameter of the pelvic outlet (mean increase, 4 mm; Conclusion: A hip- and knee-flexed position is associated with specific and quantifiable changes in pelvic outlet morphology and pelvic orientation in non-pregnant women. These findings provide preliminary anatomical and biomechanical evidence regarding position-related pelvic mobility. Further studies in pregnant populations are required to determine the clinical relevance of these positional changes during labor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.