ArticlePublic health weekly report2026
Preventive Response to Avian Influenza Infection in Humans in the Metropolitan Region, 2025-2026.
Article in Public health weekly report, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Avian influenza (AI) continues to occur among poultry and wild birds, and human infection with AI viruses can result from exposure to infected birds. The continued occurrence of human cases overseas has highlighted the importance of preventing the introduction and spread of the virus as a major public health priority. This study aims to describe the prevention and response activities for AI human infection in the metropolitan area during the 2025-2026 season and identifies areas for improvement. Methods: In collaboration with public health and livestock departments across four metropolitan jurisdictions, a response task force for human AI infection was established, and a multi-agency hotline system was activated. High-risk groups, including poultry workers, were provided with preventive education. Furthermore, active surveillance and field inspections were conducted among exposed individuals and affected farms. Results: During the 2025-2026 season in the metropolitan area, 34 highly pathogenic AI outbreaks were reported. Active surveillance was conducted among 3,667 high-risk individuals, including culling workers, poultry farm workers, and response personnel, who completed the 10-day monitoring period without loss to follow-up. Although three suspected cases were identified, laboratory and epidemiologic investigations confirmed that there were no human AI infections. Conclusions: This study evaluated the operation of an intersectoral system for preventing and responding to human AI infection, highlighting the challenges of managing high-risk groups, particularly foreign workers. Future efforts should strengthen multilingual risk communication and implement surveillance strategies tailored specifically to repeatedly affected areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.