ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2026
Rapid antifungal phenotypic detection of
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Invasive fungal infections have become a significant cause of mortality among immunocompromised and critically patients. Methods: Antifungal susceptibility testing was performed on 85 clinical isolates of Results: The proportion of isolates demonstrating resistance to FLZ was 28.2% (24/85), while to VOR was 21.2% (18/85). With regard to the antifungal susceptibility prediction models, it was found that all machine-learning models achieved effective prediction within 6-8 hours of drug exposure. The FLZ and VOR models demonstrated the highest discriminative ability, with the Logit model for FLZ attaining an AUC of 0.923 and the SVM model for VOR achieving an AUC of 0.900. Notably, both models exhibited F1-scores that surpassed 0.88. Feature-importance analysis revealed that phenotypic signals from 5-8 h contributed most to prediction accuracy, reflecting the time-dependent nature of antifungal effects. Conclusions: Machine-learning models based on early phenotypic data have been shown to be capable of accurately predicting antifungal susceptibility within 8 hours.This represents a significant improvement over conventional methods and provides a promising technical framework for the development of rapid antifungal susceptibility testing and precision anti-infective therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.