ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Deep learning-assisted near-real-time identification of the inferior mesenteric artery and vein during laparoscopic rectal resection: a single-center proof-of-concept study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Reliable identification of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) and inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) is essential for safe vascular control during laparoscopic rectal resection (LRR). We developed and internally evaluated a near-real-time semantic segmentation model using standard white-light laparoscopic video to support intraoperative anatomical recognition. Methods: This single-center retrospective proof-of-concept study included operative videos from 16 patients who underwent LRR between February 2024 and May 2025. Frames were sampled at 1 frame/s, yielding 2,720 expert-annotated RGB images (1,758 IMA images and 962 IMV images). Data were divided at the patient level into a training/development cohort (13 patients, 2,260 frames) and an internal holdout test cohort (3 patients, 460 frames). A frame-wise two-dimensional U-Net was configured using nnU-Net v2. Multiclass segmentation was compared with vessel-specific binary segmentation. Twenty gastrointestinal surgeons who had not participated in model development assessed preliminary usability and acceptance using three 0-4 Likert items. Results: Vessel-specific binary segmentation produced more balanced performance, with the clearest improvement for the IMV. In the internal holdout test cohort, the IMA Dice coefficient, precision, and recall were 0.940 +/- 0.025, 0.945 +/- 0.023, and 0.940 +/- 0.020, respectively; the corresponding IMV values were 0.980 +/- 0.010, 0.982 +/- 0.017, and 0.978 +/- 0.018. On an NVIDIA RTX 3090 GPU, inference reached 12.7 frames/s, with approximately 0.08 s of network processing per frame. Surgeons rated perceived recognition accuracy at 3.41 +/- 0.09 and future clinical potential at 3.39 +/- 0.09 on the 0-4 scale. Conclusion: The nnU-Net-configured two-dimensional U-Net achieved high segmentation scores on selected internal test data and supported near-real-time visualization. These findings provide early evidence of technical feasibility rather than clinical effectiveness. Multicenter external validation, testing in difficult operative fields, objective human-factors experiments, and prospective clinical evaluation are required before clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.