ArticleFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2026
Reward contingency reorganizes lateral orbitofrontal cortex pyramidal neuron activity from reward-aligned to action-aligned during associative learning.
Article in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Animals must learn not only which cues predict reward, but also when to act to obtain it. Although the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) encodes reward-related information, whether reward contingency is sufficient to reorganize the temporal alignment of OFC activity remains unclear. Methods: We recorded calcium signals from lateral OFC pyramidal neurons (lOFC-PNs) in wild-type (WT) and Results: Licking behavior and lOFC-PN activity were comparable between WT and KO mice, supporting pooled analysis. Under Pavlovian contingencies, licking and lOFC-PN activity were concentrated around reward delivery. Under instrumental contingencies, both shifted to the pre-reward delay period, and the timing of lOFC-PN activity became progressively coupled to anticipatory licking as learning advanced. A cue-free lick test and linear mixed-effects modeling confirmed that these contingency-related differences reflected reward contingency rather than licking Conclusion: These findings indicate that reward contingency dynamically reorganizes the temporal alignment of lOFC-PN activity and its coupling with behavior, shifting from reward-aligned under Pavlovian learning to action-aligned under instrumental learning. This contingency-dependent temporal reorganization may support flexible adaptation of neural processing to changing reward contingencies during associative learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.