Trial reportJournal of attention disorders2026
Comprehensive Treatment and Monthly 2 Year Follow-Up in Children With ADHD: Randomized Controlled Prospective Study.
Trial report in Journal of attention disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectivesTo evaluate the efficacy of regular monthly follow up in maintaining treatment gains versus follow up as needed in the community for children ages 6 to 12 years with ADHD.MethodsOne hundred and eighty six children, age 6 to 13 with DSM-IV diagnosed Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) (combined presentation) received 3 months of comprehensive treatment which included long-acting stimulant medication titrated to optimal dose (via parent and teacher reports) and weekly parent training groups and child social skills and academic training. After the 3 months of treatment, children were randomized to either monthly follow up by the research team (treatment group) or follow up as usual in the community (control group). Comprehensive evaluations occurred at 3 months at the end of the comprehensive treatment, and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 month follow-up.ResultsChildren in both groups improved significantly in all domains after the 3 months of intensive comprehensive treatment. Treatment gains were maintained during the 2 year follow up period in both groups. However, the Hyperactive/Impulsive rating in Conners scale by parent report and some teacher reports were worse in the community group during the follow-up period.ConclusionThe importance of the initial intensive comprehensive 3 month treatment cannot be underestimated as these treatments resulted in significant improvements which were maintained for 2 years in both groups. Factors such as social economic status and available community treatment which may have influenced these results are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.