ArticleHealth promotion practice2026
From Formation to Maintenance: Developing a Community-Led Coalition Within a Center for AIDS Research.
Article in Health promotion practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Community-engaged research (CEnR) involves a collaborative research approach between researchers and community members. Community advisory groups, often central to CEnR, have a strong tradition and role in HIV research. Applying an established framework for community group processes, we describe the formation, operation, and maintenance planning of a community-led coalition housed within a Center for AIDS Research (CFAR), whose mission is to support HIV-related CEnR. While most academically affiliated community groups are led by researchers, our Coalition utilizes a governance structure that prioritizes community leadership. Using a human-centered design framework, we led a 2-hr group meeting on November 25, 2025 in which Coalition members discussed group strengths and weaknesses, opportunities for change, and how to better meet the needs of the community. Human-centered design is an accessible framework used to stimulate group discussion and identify priorities. Participants identified community-led leadership and geographic diversity as major strengths. Although representation of racial, ethnic, sexual, and gender minorities remains insufficient, enhancing diversity of the coalition was identified as both an opportunity for growth and the Coalition's top priority for the coming year. Our Coalition's experience exemplifies the dynamic nature of community groups and the need to continuously revisit group priorities. It also highlights the importance of community-led advisory groups to ensure HIV researchers and their support systems center community needs and prioritize them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.