Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42698310›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association

Psychometric Evaluation of the Intraprofessional Collaborative Practice Survey in Entry-Level Occupational Therapy Students: A Rasch Analysis.

Chia-Wei Fan

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Chia-Wei FanDepartment of Occupational Therapy, AdventHealth University, Orlando, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8534-4934

Funding

OSTLTS CDC HHS B01 OT009024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ImportanceCollaboration between occupational therapists (OTs) and occupational therapy assistants (OTAs) supports coordinated client-centered care. Although the Intraprofessional Collaborative Practice Survey (ICPS) has been used to document progress in occupational therapy, Rasch-based psychometric evidence is limited.ObjectiveTo evaluate the ICPS psychometric properties using Rasch analysis and examine differential item functioning (DIF) between master of occupational therapy (MOT) and doctor of occupational therapy (OTD) students.DesignCross-sectional psychometric validation study.SettingAccredited occupational therapy programs across the United States.ParticipantsIn total, 444 occupational therapy students (272 MOT [mean age = 24.55 years; 7.4% male] and 172 OTD [mean age = 24.84 years; 8.7% male]).Outcomes and MeasuresIntraprofessional Collaborative Practice Survey (ICPS)-Occupational Therapist version, a 20-item survey with

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorOccupational TherapistsOccupational TherapyStudents, Health OccupationsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesYoung Adultdifferential item functioningintraprofessional collaborationOT–OTA partnershipRasch measurement

Identifiers

PMID42698310
PMCPMC13640401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.