Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42698299›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational science2026

Expanding Quantitative Medicines' Reach: Systems and Methods to Enhance R&D Productivity and Decision-Making in the Agentic-Era.

Brian W Corrigan, Eric Anderson, Andrew Tredennick, Luis Martinez Lomeli, Megan Cala Pane, Tyler Dunlap, Brian Davis, James Rogers, Marc R Gastonguay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Brian W CorriganStrategic Advisory Solutions, Metrum Research Group, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0166-7076
Eric AndersonStrategic Advisory Solutions, Metrum Research Group, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Andrew TredennickStrategic Advisory Solutions, Metrum Research Group, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1254-3339
Luis Martinez LomeliStrategic Advisory Solutions, Metrum Research Group, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0429-542X
Megan Cala PaneStrategic Advisory Solutions, Metrum Research Group, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Tyler DunlapStrategic Advisory Solutions, Metrum Research Group, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Brian DavisStrategic Advisory Solutions, Metrum Research Group, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
James RogersStrategic Advisory Solutions, Metrum Research Group, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Marc R GastonguayStrategic Advisory Solutions, Metrum Research Group, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into drug discovery and an expanding global medicines pipeline, new drug approvals have declined, highlighting a paradox in biopharma: More drugs discovered, but less approvals, higher costs, and longer timelines. Reasons for the decreased research and development (R&D) efficiency are multifactorial, in part driven by the complexity of new modalities, difficult targets and indications, and persistence of cognitive biases in clinical decision-making. One proposed solution to address R&D productivity challenges includes the adoption of organization-wide quantitative decision frameworks (QDFs). QDFs have the potential to increase R&D productivity by integrating quantitative assessments of program risk and value, clinical development costs, time, and probability of success into product valuations. A QDF integrates emerging clinical characteristics of the product through model-predicted efficacy and safety and links them to common valuation models to quantify the impact of product risk and uncertainty on value at different development stages. Context-aware AI can dynamically incorporate relevant unstructured information including clinical, competitor, market, and regulatory data into a QDF. The framework may be applied to compare clinical development scenarios for a single program, evaluate trade-offs between programs, and support portfolio-level decision making. Application of comprehensive QDFs in drug development promotes organizational alignment and transparency in product valuations, thereby supporting rationale decision-making, investment partnership negotiations, and product reimbursement assessment.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDrug DevelopmentDrug DiscoveryDecision MakingDrug ApprovalHumansbiasdecision frameworkeffectivenessheuristicsMIDDqualityrisk productivitytarget product profilevalue

Identifiers

PMID42698299
PMCPMC13545536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.