ArticleGenome biology and evolution2026
Genomic Footprints of Historical Introgression Between Ancient Lineages of Wild Oryza AA-Genome Species With Widely Separated Contemporary Distributions.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genome-wide prediction of cloned disease resistance homologues across the Oryza genus.The plant genome · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Phylogenetic incongruence is increasingly recognized as pervasive, yet the extent to which reticulate evolution occurs between groups separated by substantial geographical distances and deep phylogenetic divergence remains poorly characterized. In the Oryza AA-genome group-a model for plant speciation and domestication-the traditional bifurcation model posits that Australian Oryza meridionalis and African Oryza longistaminata occupy basal branches, distinct from the more recently diversified monophyletic clade comprising Asian and other African lineages, including major cultivars. However, recent evidence from endogenous viral sequences has hinted at unexpected genetic relatedness between African O. longistaminata and Asian Oryza sativa, which are geographically and phylogenetically distant. Here, we conducted a genome-wide survey across 11 Oryza species to systematically identify genomic regions exhibiting phylogenetic incongruence. Widespread phylogenetic discordance was observed, notably involving genomic segments in which O. longistaminata showed phylogenetic proximity to Asian species, contradicting their established deep divergence. To distinguish between introgression and incomplete lineage sorting, we performed four-taxon ABBA-BABA tests, which provided statistical support for introgression. Furthermore, divergence time estimates for these incongruent regions were younger than the species divergence times, suggesting historical introgression between the ancestors of lineages that are currently separated by vast geographical distances. Systematic assessments indicated that potential analytical artifacts, such as compositional bias and substitution saturation, were unlikely to explain the observations. These convergent lines of evidence suggest that ancient introgression had occurred between currently geographically separated and evolutionarily divergent Oryza lineages, leaving detectable footprints across their modern genomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.