ArticleThe New phytologist2026
Forest under stress: responses and recovery of water relations across scales during the compound drought in summer 2022.
Article in The New phytologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Forest under stress: responses and recovery of water relations across scales during the compound drought in summer 2022.The New phytologist · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The summer of 2022 was characterized by compound soil and atmospheric drought (CSAD; low soil water content, SWC, and high vapor pressure deficit, VPD) in Central Europe, threatening forest carbon sequestration and water balance, yet linked ecosystem- and tree-level hydraulic responses remain poorly resolved. We assessed the response and recovery of water relations of a beech-dominated montane mixed deciduous forest in Switzerland (CH-Lae) to the 2022 CSAD through a series of ecosystem-scale (evapotranspiration, ET; canopy conductance, Gs) as well as tree-scale measurements, including leaf-level (leaf water potential, LWP; stomatal conductance, gs), stem-level (nighttime stem rehydration, NSR) and root-level (root water uptake depth, RWU depth) variables. During peak CSAD, ET and Gs declined by up to 50%, driven primarily by low SWC. Midday and predawn LWP declined significantly. Beech and maple accessed deeper water (> 70 cm), maintaining NSR and gs during CSAD and fully recovering thereafter; spruce and fir relied on shallow water (< 30 cm), showing stronger NSR reductions but still full recovery post-CSAD. Our findings demonstrate that species-specific hydraulic traits drive forest-scale water dynamics under CSAD conditions. Integrating these insights into forest adaptation strategies will be critical for sustaining forests under intensifying compound droughts in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.