Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42698066›Full record

ArticleAnimal genetics2026

The Animal Variant Classification Guidelines v2: An Update With New Criteria and Improved Clarifications.

Lore Desmet, Carlotta Ferrari, Marie Abitbol, Heidi Anderson, Danika Bannasch, Hubert Bauer, Jerold Bell, Nüket Bilgen, Lucie Chevallier, Caroline Dufaure de Citres and 22 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors.

Lore DesmetLaboratory of Animal Genetics, Department of Veterinary and Biosciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke-Melle, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4550-0820
Carlotta FerrariDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, University of Milan, Lodi, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4853-4480
Marie AbitbolVetAgro Sup, Univ. Lyon, Marcy-l'Etoile, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5615-7897
Heidi AndersonLaboratory of Animal Genetics, Department of Veterinary and Biosciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke-Melle, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5561-0901
Danika BannaschDepartment of Population Health and Reproduction, University of California Davis School of Veterinary Medicine, Davis, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7614-7207
Hubert BauerLaboklin GmbH & Co. KG, Bad Kissingen, Germany.
Jerold BellDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine, Tufts University, North Grafton, Massachusetts, USA.
Nüket BilgenGeneControl GmbH, Grub, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2324-7965
Lucie ChevallierU955-IMRB, Team 10-Biology of the Neuromuscular System, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Caroline Dufaure de CitresAntagene-Animal Genomics Laboratory, La Tour de Salvagny, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6968-3864
Jonas DonnerGenomeTails Pet Genetic Counselling and Consulting Services, Espoo, Finland.
Carrie J FinnoDepartment of Population Health and Reproduction, University of California Davis School of Veterinary Medicine, Davis, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5924-0234
Guillermo GiovambattistaInstitute of Veterinary Genetics (IGEVET, UNLP-CONICET), Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, National University of La Plata, La Plata, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8365-3303
Steven M HarrisonAmbry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9614-9111
Jessica J HaywardDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Cornell Veterinary Biobank, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6213-5013
Jens HäggströmDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3402-023X
Jason T HuffWisdom Panel, Mars Petcare Science & Diagnostics, Fountain Valley, California, USA.
Tosso LeebInstitute of Genetics, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0553-4880
Ingrid LjungvallDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6617-0454
Maria LongeriDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, University of Milan, Lodi, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7863-1855
Leslie A LyonsDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1628-7726
Marcela MartinezApplied Genetics Laboratory, Sociedad Rural Argentina, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4666-2910
Cathryn MellershDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Canine Genetics Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2336-0370
Frank W NicholasSydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9178-3965
Åsa OhlssonDepartment of Animal Biosciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1116-0141
Jessica L PetersenDepartment of Animal Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5438-8555
Pascale SmetsSmall Animal Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke-Melle, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9375-2599
Maria G StrillacciDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, University of Milan, Lodi, Italy.
Imke TammenSydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Camden, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5520-6597
Samantha Van BurenOrivet Genetic Pet Care, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.
Frank G van SteenbeekDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5460-6540
Bart J G BroeckxLaboratory of Animal Genetics, Department of Veterinary and Biosciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke-Melle, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6742-3911

Funding

Ronald Bruce Anstee BequestRoyal Canin
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Animal Variant Classification Guidelines (AVCG) were developed to standardize and objectify the classification of putative disease-causing variants. These guidelines are sufficiently reproducible and are used to classify previously published and new disease-causing variants across species. Here, the guidelines are updated (AVCG.v2), based on a three-phase decision process. Overall, four new criteria and seven clarifying comments were added. The number of criteria has increased from 23 to 27, with three new criteria supporting pathogenicity and one new criterion supporting benign classification. Pharmacogenomic variants were determined to fall within the scope of the guidelines. These updated guidelines are being used by the Variant Pathogenicity Working Group (VPWG), part of the Animal Genetic Testing Standardization standing committee, which is a committee of elected members of the International Society for Animal Genetics (ISAG). Under the auspices of ISAG, the VPWG retrospectively classifies published putative disease-causing variants. The pathogenicity label for a variant will be presented in the variant tables of Online Mendelian Inheritance in Animals (OMIA; https://omia.org/). The AVCGv.2 criteria and recommendations were developed by the expertise of the animal genetics community and the ISAG Executive Committee through the Animal Genetics Testing Standardization Committee endorses and strongly encourages their use to evaluate the evidence supporting pathogenicity of putative disease-causing variants.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingGenetic VariationGuidelines as TopicAnimalsbenignclinical geneticsgenetic counsellinggenetic testpathogenicvariant classificationvariant interpretation

Identifiers

PMID42698066
PMCPMC13545154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.