Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42698061›Full record

ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2026

Worry undermines savoring's ability to reduce negative picture processing.

Mia F Utayde, Annmarie MacNamara

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mia F UtaydeDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA. mutayde@tamu.edu.
Annmarie MacNamaraDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.

Funding

NIMH NIH HHS R01MH25083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Savoring is a positive emotion up-regulation strategy that increases positive emotion and the late positive potential (LPP) in response to positive pictures. Knowing whether savoring affects response to subsequently presented negative pictures might increase understanding of whether it could buttress against the impact of upcoming negative events. Nonetheless, a beneficial effect of savoring on subsequent negative emotion might run counter to attempts to maintain negative emotion that are employed by individuals high in chronic worry. We investigated whether savoring of positive pictures would alter electrocortical and self-report responses to subsequently presented negative and neutral pictures, and whether individual differences in worry would moderate this effect. On each trial, participants (N = 36) savored or viewed a positive picture, which was followed by a negative or neutral picture. Participants were asked to simply view the second picture and rate its emotional valence while EEG was recorded. Results showed that savoring positive pictures led to reduced LPPs to negative but not neutral pictures. However, this effect was attenuated for those higher in worry, such that individuals with higher levels of worry showed larger LPPs to negative pictures after savoring (versus viewing), whereas those with lower levels of worry had smaller LPPs to negative pictures after savoring. Savoring did not affect self-reported pleasantness ratings to negative pictures, and worry did not modulate savoring of positive pictures. Therefore, savoring may reduce the processing of upcoming negative pictures but may backfire for individuals higher in worry, potentially because emotional shifts are perceived as threatening.

Indexed as

AnxietyContrast Avoidance ModelEEG event-related potentialLate positive potentialPositive emotion up-regulationSavoring

Identifiers

PMID42698061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.