ArticleEmergency radiology2026
Concurrent emergency head and cervical spine CT utilization: temporal trends, diagnostic yield, and clinical implications.
Article in Emergency radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the diagnostic yield, temporal trends, and clinical implications of concurrent non-contrast head and cervical spine computed tomography (CT) in emergency department trauma patients over a 10-year period.
methodsThis single-center retrospective cohort study included 9,359 consecutive patients who underwent concurrent head and cervical-spine CT for suspected trauma between May 2012 and April 2022. Patient demographics, trauma mechanisms, alcohol documentation, imaging findings, and management of cervical fractures were analyzed. Diagnostic yields were calculated overall and by age, mechanism (with focus on ground-level falls), and time period. Temporal trends and predictors of cervical-spine fracture were assessed using regression models.
resultsAcute cervical-spine fractures were present in 4.9% (457/9,359) of patients, while intracranial or craniofacial abnormalities occurred in 23.9% (2,240/9,359). Concurrent abnormalities on both scans were rare (1.3%), with no significant overall association between positive head CT and cervical-spine fracture (OR 1.16, p = 0.174). Imaging volume increased five-fold over the decade, while diagnostic yields declined significantly for both cervical fractures (from 7.1% to 3.9%) and cranial abnormalities (from 28.5% to 22.0%; both p < 0.001). This decline was driven by a rising proportion of ground-level falls (from 47% to 61%), a low-energy mechanism with low yield. Of 457 cervical fractures, 19.9% were treated surgically.
conclusionsDespite a five-fold increase in concurrent head and cervical spine CT utilization, diagnostic yields declined markedly over the 10-year period, primarily driven by the growing dominance of low-energy ground-level falls. These findings highlight significant overutilization of routine concurrent imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.