ReviewAAPS PharmSciTech2026
Regulatory and Quality Considerations of Antibody-drug Conjugates.
Review in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADCs) have become well-established as an important class of oncology therapeutics with 15 FDA-approved ADCs for various cancer types and hundreds more ADCs in clinical development. This chapter highlights the unique regulatory considerations for the development of ADCs in oncology given their dual nature as biologics and small-molecule drugs. Topics covered include the organization of applications in eCTD format, meeting types with FDA, and key considerations for a successful regulatory application with a particular emphasis on the Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls (CMC)-related strategy. Regulatory pathways, such as Fast Track and Breakthrough Therapy, are discussed as options to expedite ADC development. In early development, both the antibody and the cytotoxic linker-payload must meet detailed CMC requirements to ensure patient safety. The transition from a Phase 1-enabling process to a validated, commercial-scale manufacturing process for a biologic involves a complex interplay of science, engineering, and regulatory compliance. This transition is often on the critical path, particularly as many novel biologic therapies receive Fast Track and/or Breakthrough Therapy Designation. This paper outlines the critical steps in process development and scale-up, highlighting common gaps encountered when moving from an early-stage process with limited manufacturing experience to a fully validated commercial process. By providing a comprehensive overview of the required regulatory deliverables and a roadmap for sequencing key workstreams, this paper aims to guide readers through the essential steps and potential pitfalls in advancing a biologic therapy from early clinical development to market launch.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42698054What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.