Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42698042›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2026

Effects of supervised exercise immediately after bariatric surgery: results from the EFIBAR randomized trial.

Elena Martínez-Rosales, Alba Hernández-Martínez, Laura López-Sánchez, María José Torrente-Sánchez, Alba Esteban-Simón, Emilio Villa-González, Yaira Barranco-Ruiz, Manuel A Rodríguez-Pérez, Manuel Alcaraz-Ibáñez, Carlos Gómez-Navarro and 10 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Elena Martínez-RosalesDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Granada, Granada, 18071, Spain. elemarles@ugr.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8106-6823
Alba Hernández-MartínezDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5234-7530
Laura López-SánchezSport and Health University Research Institute (iMUDS), University of Granada, 18071, Granada, España.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5903-8327
María José Torrente-SánchezObesity Unit, HLA Mediterraneo Hospital, Almeria, Spain.
Alba Esteban-SimónDepartment of Education, Faculty of Education, Area of Physical Education and Sports, University of Almería, Almería, 04120, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5296-4379
Emilio Villa-GonzálezSport and Health University Research Institute (iMUDS), University of Granada, 18071, Granada, España.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2815-2060
Yaira Barranco-RuizSport and Health University Research Institute (iMUDS), University of Granada, 18071, Granada, España.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7435-7702
Manuel A Rodríguez-PérezDepartment of Education, Faculty of Education, Area of Physical Education and Sports, University of Almería, Almería, 04120, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1336-5979
Manuel Alcaraz-IbáñezDepartment of Education, Faculty of Education, Area of Physical Education and Sports, University of Almería, Almería, 04120, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1297-9565
Carlos Gómez-NavarroDepartment of Cardiology, Torrecardenas University Hospital, Almeria, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6033-696X
Jesús AceitunoDepartment of Cardiology, Torrecardenas University Hospital, Almeria, Spain.
Reúl Reyes-ParrillaDepartment of Cardiology, Torrecardenas University Hospital, Almeria, Spain.
José Antonio Aparicio-GómezDepartment of Cardiology, Torrecardenas University Hospital, Almeria, Spain.
Lorena Carmona-RodríguezDepartment of Structure Macromolecules, National Center for Biotechnology, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CNB-CSIC), Madrid, 28049, Spain.
Pablo Soriano-MaldonadoDepartment of Chemistry and Physics, Area of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Almería, Almería, 04120, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3696-1319
Sonia Martínez-ForteDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Torrecardenas University Hospital, Almeria, Spain.
Ana María Fernández-AlonsoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Torrecardenas University Hospital, Almeria, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4844-2145
Manuel Ferrer-MárquezBariatric Surgery Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Torrecárdenas University Hospital, Almería, Spain.
Alberto Soriano-MaldonadoDepartment of Education, Faculty of Education, Area of Physical Education and Sports, University of Almería, Almería, 04120, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4626-420X
Enrique G ArteroDepartment of Education, Faculty of Education, Area of Physical Education and Sports, University of Almería, Almería, 04120, Spain. artero@ual.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2618-6128

Funding

Fundación Científica Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer PRDAM222381ESTEJuan de la Cierva Grant JDC2023-051490-IJuan de la Cierva Grant JDC2024-054880-ISpanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness DEP2016-74926-R
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for severe obesity. We evaluated whether a 16-week supervised exercise program initiated immediately post-surgery improves weight loss, body composition, cardiometabolic health, inflammation, and physical fitness compared with usual care.

methodsIn this randomized clinical trial, 80 participants undergoing bariatric surgery were assessed before surgery, 4- and 12-month post-surgery. The intervention consisted of 16 weeks of individually supervised concurrent exercise training initiated ~ 10 days post-surgery, with three 60-min sessions/week including progressive resistance training (50-75% of one-repetition maximum) and aerobic training (65-85% heart rate reserve). Adherence was monitored throughout the intervention. The main outcome was percent of total weight loss (%TWL).

resultsNo significant differences between groups were observed for the primary outcome. At 4 months, %TWL was 24.9% in the exercise group and 23.4% in the control group; corresponding values at 12 months were 37.0% and 37.2%, respectively. Compared with usual care, the exercise group showed greater reductions in systolic blood pressure (- 6.5 mmHg; 95% CI, - 12.7 to - 0.2; p = 0.040) and glycated hemoglobin (- 0.3%; 95% CI, - 0.5 to - 0.1; p = 0.018) at 4 months. These differences were not maintained at 12 months. No significant between-group differences were observed in body composition, inflammatory markers, or physical fitness outcomes at any timepoint.

conclusionA 16-week supervised concurrent exercise program initiated ~ 10 days after bariatric surgery did not improve weight loss compared with usual care. Although short-term improvements in systolic blood pressure and glycated hemoglobin were observed, these were not sustained at 12 months.

Indexed as

Bariatric surgeryCardiometabolic parametersExerciseFitnessObesity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.