ArticleEuropean archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry2026
Comparative evaluation of hybrid resin polymer crowns versus preformed metal crowns in primary molars of children aged 3-7 years: a prospective parallel-group clinical study.
Article in European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeEarly childhood caries (ECC) is a prevalent condition affecting preschool children worldwide. Although preformed metal crowns (PMCs) are considered the gold standard for restoring primary teeth, their poor aesthetics remain a concern. Hybrid resin polymer crowns (HRPCs; BioFlx, Kids-e-Dental LLP), have been developed to address this limitation. The present study aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness of HRPCs and PMCs in children aged 3-7 years.
methodsThis prospective parallel-group clinical study included 60 children divided into two parallel groups receiving either PMCs or HRPCs. Clinical parameters assessed were retention, marginal integrity, gingival inflammation, plaque accumulation, occlusal wear, proximal contact, resistance to displacement, and parental satisfaction. Evaluations were conducted at 3, 6, and 9 months, and data were analysed using the chi-square test (p < 0.05).
resultsNo statistically significant differences were observed between groups in retention, marginal integrity, secondary caries, resistance to displacement, or proximal contact (p > 0.05). However, gingival inflammation and plaque accumulation were significantly higher in the HRPC group at 6 and 9 months. Additionally, crown wear and anatomical form were better preserved in the PMC group. Parental satisfaction was slightly higher for HRPCs, though not statistically significant.
conclusionBoth crown types showed acceptable clinical performance. While PMCs demonstrated superior durability and periodontal outcomes, HRPCs offered better aesthetics and greater parental preference. HRPCs may serve as a suitable alternative when aesthetics are prioritized. Further long-term studies with larger sample sizes are recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42698038What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.