ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2026
Structure prediction and drug screening targeting monkeypox virus polymerase and surface proteins.
Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The global outbreak and ongoing spread of the monkeypox virus (MPXV) have highlighted the urgent need for effective antiviral therapeutics. Here, we integrated artificial intelligence-based protein structure prediction, large-scale virtual screening, and experimental validation to identify preliminary hit compounds targeting MPXV. Using AlphaFold2, we predicted high-accuracy structures for seven essential MPXV proteins, including three polymerase-related and four surface proteins. Molecular docking of these targets against 6405 drugs from the ZINC15 world-approved subset generated a docking score dataset of 44,835 drug-protein pairs, from which numerous high-scoring compounds were identified. Focusing on A35R, we selected 26 compounds for experimental validation using surface plasmon resonance (SPR). Three compounds, including cepharanthine, eltrombopag, and simeprevir, exhibited measurable A35R‑associated binding signals with equilibrium dissociation constants (KD) in the micromolar range. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and molecular mechanics generalized Born surface area were employed for stability analysis and relative energetic assessment. Notably, all three have been previously reported to target other MPXV proteins, reinforcing their potential for repurposing. This work establishes AI‑driven structure prediction as a useful tool for identifying preliminary binding compounds. However, no antiviral activity has been demonstrated for these compounds; therefore, the three hit compounds warrant further optimization and biological evaluation. Our integrated approach provides a framework for rapid drug screening against emerging viral threats.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42698033What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.