ReviewAAPS PharmSciTech2026
Quality by Design for Bilayer Tablets: Integrating Formulation, Manufacturing, and Process Analytical Technology.
Review in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bilayer fixed-dose combination tablets are increasingly used to improve adherence and tailor drug-release profiles, but their development remains challenging because multiple interacting formulation and process variables strongly affect product performance. Quality by Design (QbD) offers a systematic framework to address these challenges, yet its implementation for bilayer tablets and associated analytical methods remains fragmented. In this review we map and critically analyze published applications of QbD to the formulation design, manufacturing process, and testing of bilayer tablets. Using the available literature and regulatory guidance, we summarize the rationale for bilayer formulations, the experimental designs employed, the RA tools used, and the main critical material attributes (CMAs), critical process parameters (CPPs), and critical quality attributes (CQAs) identified. Particular emphasis is placed on the use of design of experiments, process analytical technology, and multivariate data analysis to understand and control mechanical properties, interfacial adhesion, and drug-release behavior, as well as on the current status of analytical QbD for bilayer products. Overall, the evidence shows that QbD has improved control of drug release and interfacial strength and supported the scale-up of bilayer manufacturing, but prior risk analysis, robust control strategies, and Analytical Quality by Design (AQbD)-based dissolution and stability methods are still inconsistently implemented. The concepts and design principles summarized here are expected to support more rational, regulatory-aligned development of bilayer tablets and to guide future QbD applications in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42698017What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.