Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42698007›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurology2026

Treatment updates in myotonic disorders.

Emma Matthews, Mark J Specterman, Karlien Mul

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emma MatthewsDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, School of Health and Medical Sciences, Tooting Campus City St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, UK. ematthew@sgul.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3810-306X
Mark J SpectermanDepartment of Cardiology, School of Health and Medical Sciences, Tooting Campus City St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, UK.
Karlien MulDepartment of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myotonia is delayed muscle relaxation after forceful contraction. It is due to hyperexcitability of the skeletal muscle membrane. It can arise from primary skeletal muscle ion channel dysfunction, involving chloride or sodium channels, but is also a prominent clinical feature in myotonic dystrophies where altered RNA splicing leads to secondary ion channel dysregulation amongst other systemic manifestations. Clinically, myotonia can range from delayed eye opening to a disabling symptom causing impaired mobility, functional difficulty and sometimes pain. It can also be a "hidden disability" with many patients feeling socially embarrassed by "looking healthy", yet being unable to do everyday physical tasks or to do them as effortlessly as their peers. It is a symptom that almost always indicates a genetic diagnosis, although it can occur in acquired conditions, including metabolic and drug-induced causes. To experience myotonia without knowing what it is can be baffling. To receive a genetic diagnosis associated with it can be life changing. Although there is no cure, there are many effective and available symptomatic treatments for myotonia and currently we are in an exciting era of clinical trials for new molecular disease-modifying therapies for myotonic dystrophy type 1. In this review, we consider recent developments in the treatment of myotonic disorders and how they may change clinical practice.

Indexed as

Myotonic DisordersMyotonic DystrophyAnimalsHumansDisease modifyingGenomicsMyotonic disordersSodium channel blockersTherapy development

Identifiers

PMID42698007
PMCPMC13545122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.